|
alt-psychology-nlp is closing down If you want a good NLP Forum, try NLP Connections instead |
| ||||||
| | #1 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| ================================================== Design Human Engineering(tm) with John LaValle and Barbara Stepp, August 8-13, 2006 in Chicago! ================================================== This is the first DHE in Chicago since 2000. It is the only one offered in the US this year and probably 2 or more, so register early to get the low tuition. In Design Human Engineering(tm), we teach you how to design and install tools and devices inside your mind to create new and never-before-experienced powerful states. It's not really about the tools, although designing a ruler, electronic measuring device, magnifying glass or in my case, a machine that eats up cancer cells (worked for me) etc. could be valuable, couldn't it? And that's only the beginning! DHE(tm) helps you to design and install the elements to propel yourself into futures of excitement and opportunity. DHE(tm) shows your mind what's possible, to expand the field of possibilities. Richard Bandler has said that anything is possible. And he has proved it again and again. The driving force to to take something you do well and make it better, or simply learn something new, is inspiring and fun. Join DHE for a never-before experience. Learn a new way to use submodalities and how to create a control panel! =========== To register =========== Call/write now, 800-582-9980 or 312-919-9111 or barb@excelquest.com Register online at http://www.excelquest.com/dhe |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| >Richard Bandler has said that anything is possible, And he has proved it again and again. Tell me, exactly what has he proved? That is a giant statement to make without anything to back it up. You DHE folks continually use the words, mind possibilites, and what is possible, yet fail to point to any concrete evidence of it's existants. Mind possiblities and possiblities are just fluff, you fill in the blanks. If this is such powerful stuff then why oh why is Richard sick? You again are ignoring the facts. Do you offer a money back guarantee? I certainly was not happy with the cd's I purchased from them, and was not able to get my money back. >DHE(tm) shows your mind what's possible, to expand the field of possibilities. Can you give us maybe a tasty example of what your talking about here? |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| You are barking at an Ad It's a little like shouting at a billboard UnKool UnKa wrote: > >Richard Bandler has said that anything is possible, And he has proved it again and again. > > Tell me, exactly what has he proved? That is a giant statement to make > without anything to back it up. > > You DHE folks continually use the words, mind possibilites, and what is > possible, yet fail to point to any concrete evidence of it's existants. > Mind possiblities and possiblities are just fluff, you fill in the > blanks. > > If this is such powerful stuff then why oh why is Richard sick? You > again are ignoring the facts. > > Do you offer a money back guarantee? I certainly was not happy with the > cd's I purchased from them, and was not able to get my money back. > > >DHE(tm) shows your mind what's possible, to expand the field of possibilities. > > Can you give us maybe a tasty example of what your talking about here? |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| I am simply asking questions, to which I am sure they will not respond because the hype doesn't match reality. That is mostly the difference between what most post on this NG and the 3-D Mind, the hype does match reality. The 3-D Mind is soundly based on scientific facts ( Dr. Ken's brain model ) There are numerous testamonies as to how the 3-D Mind has changed people's lives, FACTS. There is a hugh support group for anyone having trouble with the 3-D Mind, where also idea's are exchanged. FACT. Money Back guarantee......FACT. Can anyone any the same? >You are barking at an Ad >It's a little like shouting at a billboard This is a really stupid comparision. Someone wrote that ad, someone posted that ad, so someone can also answer questions to that ad, if someone does post an ad and there is no one to answer questions to the posted ad, then that would be a loss of revenue and pretty much a waste of time for the poster because if someone was really interested and asked questions and no one answered, then they would lose a perspective client. If you bother to take a close look at the ad, it's all fluff. Not a single concrete thing is said. Lets take a peek at the ad. >In Design Human Engineering(tm), we teach you how to design and install tools and >devices inside your mind to create new and never-before-experienced powerful states. Bullshit...................nothing more than hype with no foundation, myself and people I know who have either listened too or have gone to this seminar say the same thing. After the binoculars part, someone went around asking others if they could see with this supposedly new thing and everyone said no, but the part that sucks is people don't want to admit they can't see because they are afraid that they are the only ones. >.It's not really about the tools, although designing a ruler, electronic measuring device, >magnifying glass or in my case, a machine that eats up cancer cells (worked for me) >etc. could be valuable, couldn't it? And that's only the beginning! DHE(tm) helps you to >design and install the elements to propel yourself into futures of excitement and >opportunity. Now this is a load of crap, just another big hype sales pitch that won't measure up. Why can I say that, it's this simple, they want to install all these good things but they violate congruence with peoples beliefs about themselves. If the beliefs are not dealt with first then all the tools in the world won't help them be that. So then all this DHE becames is a load of more Bandler crap, which people like you lap up like it's manna from heaven. So if your going to argue against me, then provide something about DHE instead of the usual flames, I've provided arguement against it, now provide some for it. |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Well Duck, I have studied the DHE2000 cd's. Also I've posted Bandler's track of stories in the apnlp yahoogroup. Building the binoculars inside me has failed. Anyone built that tool successfully? Ustahi |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Dood I ain't arguing with you. That ad looked of the automated sort, that once posted the poster never checks for any response. And I had this great comedy image form of you in your dungarees with an Uzi shouting at a billboard advert for DHE "You're all gonna die, ya bunch of slack jawed faggots!", then sprayng it full of holes. UnKa wrote: > I am simply asking questions, to which I am sure they will not respond > because the hype doesn't match reality. That is mostly the difference > between what most post on this NG and the 3-D Mind, the hype does match > reality. > > The 3-D Mind is soundly based on scientific facts ( Dr. Ken's brain > model ) Who is doctor Ken, is he your dealer ? > > >You are barking at an Ad > >It's a little like shouting at a billboard > > This is a really stupid comparision. Someone wrote that ad, someone > posted that ad, so someone can also answer questions to that ad, if > someone does post an ad and there is no one to answer questions to the > posted ad, then that would be a loss of revenue and pretty much a waste > of time for the poster because if someone was really interested and > asked questions and no one answered, then they would lose a perspective > client. > Actually it was shit funny and an extraordinarily super intelligent comparison > If you bother to take a close look at the ad, it's all fluff. Not a > single concrete thing is said. Lets take a peek at the ad. > There are claims of some stuff, but I have no data on the basis of those claims so cannot comment. > >In Design Human Engineering(tm), we teach you how to design and install tools and >devices inside your mind to create new and never-before-experienced powerful states. > > Bullshit...................nothing more than hype with no foundation, > myself and people I know who have either listened too or have gone to > this seminar say the same thing. > After the binoculars part, someone went around asking others if they > could see with this supposedly new thing and everyone said no, but the > part that sucks is people don't want to admit they can't see because > they are afraid that they are the only ones. > Again, I don't know. I now have one opinion to consider though. > >.It's not really about the tools, although designing a ruler, electronic measuring device, > >magnifying glass or in my case, a machine that eats up cancer cells (worked for me) >etc. could be valuable, couldn't it? And that's only the beginning! DHE(tm) helps you to >design and install the elements to propel yourself into futures of excitement and >opportunity. > > Now this is a load of crap, just another big hype sales pitch that > won't measure up. > Why can I say that, it's this simple, they want to install all these > good things but they violate congruence with peoples beliefs about > themselves. If the beliefs are not dealt with first then all the tools > in the world won't help them be that. So then all this DHE becames is a > load of more Bandler crap, which people like you lap up like it's manna > from heaven. > Again, I don't know. All I have is your opinion > So if your going to argue against me, then provide something about DHE > instead of the usual flames, I've provided arguement against it, now > provide some for it. As I said at the start, I'm not arguing, just taking the piss (not sure what the yank equivalent to that is). My experience of DHE is this, I know a professional NLPer who did a trance thing on me (well he believed he did, personally I was just sat with my eyes closed and really bored) and installed a control knob which when adjusted would increase or decrease my relaxation. He said to open my eyes and look at the knob in front of me, I said what knob, he said "oh, well that didn't work then !". He also told me that the DHE course improved his hearing by 1000 % and that he was the only one on the course who really got what it was all about. For me, the only true test would be to take the course and decide for myself, however I would never invest in such a course without a great deal more opinions on it, and understanding of what benefits could be expected from it. Currently it is on my list of things to be highly skeptical of (because of the claims). I would be interested to hear from anyone who has done the course and what thier experience was of it. As for the CD's, without Bandler in front of me twisting my neurons, I wouldn't be interested. Duck |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Ustahi wrote: > Well Duck, > Very well indeed > I have studied the DHE2000 cd's. Also I've posted Bandler's track of > stories in the apnlp yahoogroup. > Can you point me to this please > Building the binoculars inside me has failed. Anyone built that tool > successfully? > I'd like to know this too. > Ustahi You seem to have gotten the impression, mistakenly, that I am a proponent of DHE. I know very little about it. Duck |
|
| | #8 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| A word of advise, Duck. Of course anything we say will not be taken into account because of our reputation, however, if you want to go to a DHE semiar, great. In my opinion your wasting your time and money, but don't take that as gospel, do your own research. When the arguement broke out on this NG about DHE, I've heard a lot of people come one here and explain what they found on DHE to be so valuable. Their main points were imagine the possiblitites, growing new limbs, binocular eyesight. There were more but I don't remember what. Now, not one can prove they have any of these or that any of these things work. Do a search and find out. Oh also unconscious installation was the biggest load of crap that was discussed. If the hype can't match reality, then maybe you may want to consider something different. BUT do research and make sure they are actually offering something of substance. Or at least get a money back guarantee, if after a day your not happy. duck wrote: > Ustahi wrote: > > Well Duck, > > > > Very well indeed > > > I have studied the DHE2000 cd's. Also I've posted Bandler's track of > > stories in the apnlp yahoogroup. > > > > Can you point me to this please > > > Building the binoculars inside me has failed. Anyone built that tool > > successfully? > > > > I'd like to know this too. > > > Ustahi > > You seem to have gotten the impression, mistakenly, that I am a > proponent of DHE. I know very little about it. > > Duck |
|
| | #9 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| UnKa wrote: > A word of advise, Duck. > > Of course anything we say will not be taken into account because of our > reputation, Uh Oh, my mind reader alert warning light has just gone of, I'd better contact Comissioner Gordon. >however, if you want to go to a DHE semiar, great. In my > opinion your wasting your time and money, but don't take that as > gospel, do your own research. > Dood, If I had lots of cash...as in lots of cash, I'd go, just to know for myself. I am not currently thinking of going, due to the lack of reason for going. > When the arguement broke out on this NG about DHE, I've heard a lot of > people come one here and explain what they found on DHE to be so > valuable. > > Their main points were imagine the possiblitites, growing new limbs, > binocular eyesight. > > There were more but I don't remember what. Now, not one can prove they > have any of these or that any of these things work. Do a search and > find out. I did, and there was scant reports of actual tangible benefits. > Oh also unconscious installation was the biggest load of crap > that was discussed. I'm not sure what the deal is hear, I hear a lot of people saying it is bullshit, but I have not yet noticed anyone saying it works or that they use it. Why does the subject keep popping up, who claims that they are using it ? I did a practitioner about 8 years ago, with Bandler and towards the end he said that if anyone tells you that they are installing skills into you unconscioulsy, kick them in the nuts and demand your money back. So who is it that claims to install skills unconsciously ? >If the hype can't match reality, then maybe you may > want to consider something different. BUT do research and make sure > they are actually offering something of substance. Or at least get a > money back guarantee, if after a day your not happy. > > Once again, It is not on my list of things to do, I am just interested in listening to the experiences of those whove done the seminar Fuck !!!!......a new penis has just grown out of my forehead, and even with my telescopic sight I cannot see the end of it....proper head f**k ! Duck > duck wrote: > > Ustahi wrote: > > > Well Duck, > > > > > > > Very well indeed > > > > > I have studied the DHE2000 cd's. Also I've posted Bandler's track of > > > stories in the apnlp yahoogroup. > > > > > > > Can you point me to this please > > > > > Building the binoculars inside me has failed. Anyone built that tool > > > successfully? > > > > > > > I'd like to know this too. > > > > > Ustahi > > > > You seem to have gotten the impression, mistakenly, that I am a > > proponent of DHE. I know very little about it. > > > > Duck |
|
| | #10 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| <terrancejack@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1149166855.480610.45660@h76g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > In all seriousness, for those you have been to DHE - what specific > skills are taught at a DHE seminar? I have the DHE CD set and most all > of it is Richard doing hypnotic stories and some submodality work. Is > there anything that is new in DHE that is not in NLP? What topics are > taught in this program that are not taught in a regular NLP training? > > -Terry Yeah, and no one has replied yet to the question someone posted about the "internal binoculars" pice of whateveryoucallit I'ld be intrested to see if anyone had experience with that. Come to think of it, a testimonial of any tech that doesn't sound like it was put together by a marketing department would sound refreshing to me. |
|
| | #11 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| In all seriousness, for those you have been to DHE - what specific skills are taught at a DHE seminar? I have the DHE CD set and most all of it is Richard doing hypnotic stories and some submodality work. Is there anything that is new in DHE that is not in NLP? What topics are taught in this program that are not taught in a regular NLP training? -Terry UnKa wrote: > >Richard Bandler has said that anything is possible, And he has proved it again and again. > > Tell me, exactly what has he proved? That is a giant statement to make > without anything to back it up. > > You DHE folks continually use the words, mind possibilites, and what is > possible, yet fail to point to any concrete evidence of it's existants. > Mind possiblities and possiblities are just fluff, you fill in the > blanks. > > If this is such powerful stuff then why oh why is Richard sick? You > again are ignoring the facts. > > Do you offer a money back guarantee? I certainly was not happy with the > cd's I purchased from them, and was not able to get my money back. > > >DHE(tm) shows your mind what's possible, to expand the field of possibilities. > > Can you give us maybe a tasty example of what your talking about here? |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2006, 813, august, chicago, design human engineering |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NLP Cafe Opens, coming Thursday 2 August 2007! For Brisbane, QLD Australia | SonyaYehSpencer | alt-psychology-nlp | 0 | 07-31-2007 08:32 AM |
| 2006 Trivia Quiz | John | alt-psychology-nlp | 3 | 12-25-2006 06:00 AM |
| AD: October NLP Intensive with Barbara Stepp in Chicago | Excellence Quest Webmaster | alt-psychology-nlp | 0 | 09-18-2006 04:47 AM |
| Re: Radio show - 31 May 2006 | Larry Synes | alt-psychology-nlp | 0 | 06-02-2006 10:45 AM |
| Re: seminars in the UK in 2006 | Dr. Jonathan Royle | alt-psychology-nlp | 0 | 11-29-2005 05:30 PM |