|
alt-psychology-nlp is closing down If you want a good NLP Forum, try NLP Connections instead |
| ||||||
| | #1 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| I have spent some time looking into the NLP movement and contrasting it with Dianetics. Comparing these two is the ultimate in comparing apples and oranges- but the very difficulty in doing so is educational in itself. NLP is not a centralised military style organization in the model of the Church of Scientology. Anybody may contribute to this body of knowledge and so it is sometimes difficult to know where it begins and where it ends. For the purposes of this comparison I eliminated every part of the movement that is not in direct conflict with Dianetics. This means I will not count the activities of the Pick Up Artists who use NLP to seduce women (a claim that LRH really should have made for Dianetics). I am also eliminating motivational speakers such as Anthony Robbins because they use the principles of NLP to break bad habits but do not engage in wholesale trauma erasure. Nevertheless, I have listed celebrities of both movements as NLP endorsing celebrities because Scientology and Dianetic endorsing celebrities are not famous for practicing Dianetics. Celebrity endorsement. NLP Paul McKenna (Stage hypnotist and prolific author) Derren Brown (skeptic and NLP) This man is either the most terrifying human being on the planet or as big a fraud as LRH. Mystery (Pick Up Artist of astonishing skill) TV celebrity and stage magician. Style (Pick Up Artist, prolific writer) Runs the Style academy. Anthony Robbins (motivational speaker and self help author.) Dianetics and Scientology. Tom Cruse (fading actor) John Travolta (actor, and a much nicer guy than TC) Juliet Lewis (actress, not bad) The voice of Bart Simson! The first thing we notice is that the NLP celebrities are famous for promoting NLP- a subject with genuine popular appeal. All of the Scientology stars are beginning to age (something that happens quite quickly in Hollwood). They are all nearing their sell-by dates. To my knowledge no NLP promoting celebrity has ever blown from the movement and made a film condeming the whole movement as a fraud. Jason Beghe (a former Scientologist has done just this and his account is due to be published on Xenu TV later on today. I must therefore declare NLP the winner of the Celebrity round despite the fact that NLP celebrities seem to be largely UK based and less globally recognised than Hollywood actors. Then we come to book sales. Dianetics is heavily promoted in all sorts of ways and yet very few copies are sold (even fewer are read). The cult make all sorts of fantastic claims such as ten million copies sold- yet the book is not available in mainstream bookshops. If the book really were the bestseller the cult claim, then bookshops would want a piece of the action and would stock it. Just how were these books supposed to have been sold? Through official Scinetology bookshops? There cannot be more than one hundred of these worldwide. This translates as 100,000 books per bookshop. Clearly nonsense. We must therefore declare NLP the winner on books and tapes- at least until we have more information. So.. NLP is out promoting Diantics at every turn- and yet Dianetics as the more impressive promotional materials and introductory films. Dianetics has purpose built course rooms. This might seem to indicate that Dianetics is better at converting initial interest to expensive courses and I think this is accurate. Judging by postings on the newsgroup alt.psycology.nlp there are an average of ten new NLP practitioners (not NLP masters, these are introductory courses) produced each month in the London area. Very few of these go on to practice NLP for a living. It is probably an NLP equivalent to becoming a Book One auditor. By this measure, the Church if Scientology is winning the war against NLP- at least for the time being. London has two centers capable of delivering Book One Auditor training and I would guess that the total number of graduates is greater- but not by much. This is all very well, but it does not indicate how much NLP has been able damage Dianetics as a recruitment tool. How much is NLP hurting the Church in the pocket? All numbers are estimates here. Please feel free to correct me. Ten NLP completions a month. It is reasonable to assume that five of these completions are from people who would otherwise have chosen Dianetics. Assumed average profit per Book One Auditor- £500 (very conservative). £500 x 5 =£2500 per month. £2500 x 12 = £30,000 pa loss of income from NLP activity. This is in the London area alone. In addition to this we also have the fact that NLP promotes something called 'presuppositions' that directly contradict Dianetics at every point. These ideas have become widely accepted and prevent Dianetics from entering the mainstream. The total cost of NLP to the Church of Scientology is therefore many times greater than the measurable cash cost Who will win the war? I cannot tell- but NLP seems to have drawn first blood. |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| On Apr 17, 6:10 am, Richard Ford <carnivalofreact...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: nlp is bullshit, I have no idea about dianetic's, one because I don't care, two because I know very little about them and still don't care to know anything about them. Read this link on nlp http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com...-plausibe.html Tim > I have spent some time looking into the NLP movement and contrasting > it with Dianetics. > > Comparing these two is the ultimate in comparing apples and oranges- > but the very difficulty in doing so is educational in itself. > > NLP is not a centralised military style organization in the model of > the Church of Scientology. Anybody may contribute to this body of > knowledge and so it is sometimes difficult to know where it begins and > where it ends. > > For the purposes of this comparison I eliminated every part of the > movement that is not in direct conflict with Dianetics. > > This means I will not count the activities of the Pick Up Artists who > use NLP to seduce women (a claim that LRH really should have made for > Dianetics). > > I am also eliminating motivational speakers such as Anthony Robbins > because they use the principles of NLP to break bad habits but do not > engage in wholesale trauma erasure. > > Nevertheless, I have listed celebrities of both movements as NLP > endorsing celebrities because Scientology and Dianetic endorsing > celebrities are not famous for practicing Dianetics. > > Celebrity endorsement. > > NLP > > Paul McKenna (Stage hypnotist and prolific author) > > Derren Brown (skeptic and NLP) This man is either the most terrifying > human being on the planet or as big a fraud as LRH. > > Mystery (Pick Up Artist of astonishing skill) TV celebrity and stage > magician. > > Style (Pick Up Artist, prolific writer) Runs the Style academy. > > Anthony Robbins (motivational speaker and self help author.) > > Dianetics and Scientology. > > Tom Cruse (fading actor) > > John Travolta (actor, and a much nicer guy than TC) > > Juliet Lewis (actress, not bad) > > The voice of Bart Simson! > > The first thing we notice is that the NLP celebrities are famous for > promoting NLP- a subject with genuine popular appeal. > > All of the Scientology stars are beginning to age (something that > happens quite quickly in Hollwood). They are all nearing their sell-by > dates. > > To my knowledge no NLP promoting celebrity has ever blown from the > movement and made a film condeming the whole movement as a fraud. > Jason Beghe (a former Scientologist has done just this and his account > is due to be published on Xenu TV later on today. > > I must therefore declare NLP the winner of the Celebrity round despite > the fact that NLP celebrities seem to be largely UK based and less > globally recognised than Hollywood actors. > > Then we come to book sales. Dianetics is heavily promoted in all sorts > of ways and yet very few copies are sold (even fewer are read). > > The cult make all sorts of fantastic claims such as ten million copies > sold- yet the book is not available in mainstream bookshops. If the > book really were the bestseller the cult claim, then bookshops would > want a piece of the action and would stock it. > > Just how were these books supposed to have been sold? Through official > Scinetology bookshops? There cannot be more than one hundred of these > worldwide. This translates as 100,000 books per bookshop. Clearly > nonsense. > > We must therefore declare NLP the winner on books and tapes- at least > until we have more information. > > So.. NLP is out promoting Diantics at every turn- and yet Dianetics as > the more impressive promotional materials and introductory films. > Dianetics has purpose built course rooms. > > This might seem to indicate that Dianetics is better at converting > initial interest to expensive courses and I think this is accurate. > > Judging by postings on the newsgroup alt.psycology.nlp there are an > average of ten new NLP practitioners (not NLP masters, these are > introductory courses) produced each month in the London area. Very few > of these go on to practice NLP for a living. It is probably an NLP > equivalent to becoming a Book One auditor. By this measure, the Church > if Scientology is winning the war against NLP- at least for the time > being. London has two centers capable of delivering Book One Auditor > training and I would guess that the total number of graduates is > greater- but not by much. > > This is all very well, but it does not indicate how much NLP has been > able damage Dianetics as a recruitment tool. How much is NLP hurting > the Church in the pocket? > > All numbers are estimates here. Please feel free to correct me. > > Ten NLP completions a month. It is reasonable to assume that five of > these completions are from people who would otherwise have chosen > Dianetics. > > Assumed average profit per Book One Auditor- £500 (very conservative). > > £500 x 5 =£2500 per month. > > £2500 x 12 = £30,000 pa loss of income from NLP activity. > > This is in the London area alone. > > In addition to this we also have the fact that NLP promotes something > called 'presuppositions' that directly contradict Dianetics at every > point. These ideas have become widely accepted and prevent Dianetics > from entering the mainstream. > > The total cost of NLP to the Church of Scientology is therefore many > times greater than the measurable cash cost > > Who will win the war? I cannot tell- but NLP seems to have drawn first > blood. |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| On 17 Apr, 15:04, HellBwat <monsterbra...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 6:10 am, Richard Ford <carnivalofreact...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > > nlp is bullshit, I have no idea about dianetic's, one because I don't > care, two because I know very little about them and still don't care > to know anything about them. > > Read this link on nlp > > http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com...-plausibe.html > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tim > > > > > I have spent some time looking into the NLP movement and contrasting > > it with Dianetics. > > > Comparing these two is the ultimate in comparing apples and oranges- > > but the very difficulty in doing so is educational in itself. > > > NLP is not a centralised military style organization in the model of > > the Church of Scientology. Anybody may contribute to this body of > > knowledge and so it is sometimes difficult to know where it begins and > > where it ends. > > > For the purposes of this comparison I eliminated every part of the > > movement that is not in direct conflict with Dianetics. > > > This means I will not count the activities of the Pick Up Artists who > > use NLP to seduce women (a claim that LRH really should have made for > > Dianetics). > > > I am also eliminating motivational speakers such as Anthony Robbins > > because they use the principles of NLP to break bad habits but do not > > engage in wholesale trauma erasure. > > > Nevertheless, I have listed celebrities of both movements as NLP > > endorsing celebrities because Scientology and Dianetic endorsing > > celebrities are not famous for practicing Dianetics. > > > Celebrity endorsement. > > > NLP > > > Paul McKenna (Stage hypnotist and prolific author) > > > Derren Brown (skeptic and NLP) This man is either the most terrifying > > human being on the planet or as big a fraud as LRH. > > > Mystery (Pick Up Artist of astonishing skill) TV celebrity and stage > > magician. > > > Style (Pick Up Artist, prolific writer) Runs the Style academy. > > > Anthony Robbins (motivational speaker and self help author.) > > > Dianetics and Scientology. > > > Tom Cruse (fading actor) > > > John Travolta (actor, and a much nicer guy than TC) > > > Juliet Lewis (actress, not bad) > > > The voice of Bart Simson! > > > The first thing we notice is that the NLP celebrities are famous for > > promoting NLP- a subject with genuine popular appeal. > > > All of the Scientology stars are beginning to age (something that > > happens quite quickly in Hollwood). They are all nearing their sell-by > > dates. > > > To my knowledge no NLP promoting celebrity has ever blown from the > > movement and made a film condeming the whole movement as a fraud. > > Jason Beghe (a former Scientologist has done just this and his account > > is due to be published on Xenu TV later on today. > > > I must therefore declare NLP the winner of the Celebrity round despite > > the fact that NLP celebrities seem to be largely UK based and less > > globally recognised than Hollywood actors. > > > Then we come to book sales. Dianetics is heavily promoted in all sorts > > of ways and yet very few copies are sold (even fewer are read). > > > The cult make all sorts of fantastic claims such as ten million copies > > sold- yet the book is not available in mainstream bookshops. If the > > book really were the bestseller the cult claim, then bookshops would > > want a piece of the action and would stock it. > > > Just how were these books supposed to have been sold? Through official > > Scinetology bookshops? There cannot be more than one hundred of these > > worldwide. This translates as 100,000 books per bookshop. Clearly > > nonsense. > > > We must therefore declare NLP the winner on books and tapes- at least > > until we have more information. > > > So.. NLP is out promoting Diantics at every turn- and yet Dianetics as > > the more impressive promotional materials and introductory films. > > Dianetics has purpose built course rooms. > > > This might seem to indicate that Dianetics is better at converting > > initial interest to expensive courses and I think this is accurate. > > > Judging by postings on the newsgroup alt.psycology.nlp there are an > > average of ten new NLP practitioners (not NLP masters, these are > > introductory courses) produced each month in the London area. Very few > > of these go on to practice NLP for a living. It is probably an NLP > > equivalent to becoming a Book One auditor. By this measure, the Church > > if Scientology is winning the war against NLP- at least for the time > > being. London has two centers capable of delivering Book One Auditor > > training and I would guess that the total number of graduates is > > greater- but not by much. > > > This is all very well, but it does not indicate how much NLP has been > > able damage Dianetics as a recruitment tool. How much is NLP hurting > > the Church in the pocket? > > > All numbers are estimates here. Please feel free to correct me. > > > Ten NLP completions a month. It is reasonable to assume that five of > > these completions are from people who would otherwise have chosen > > Dianetics. > > > Assumed average profit per Book One Auditor- £500 (very conservative). > > > £500 x 5 =£2500 per month. > > > £2500 x 12 = £30,000 pa loss of income from NLP activity. > > > This is in the London area alone. > > > In addition to this we also have the fact that NLP promotes something > > called 'presuppositions' that directly contradict Dianetics at every > > point. These ideas have become widely accepted and prevent Dianetics > > from entering the mainstream. > > > The total cost of NLP to the Church of Scientology is therefore many > > times greater than the measurable cash cost > > > Who will win the war? I cannot tell- but NLP seems to have drawn first > > blood.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Thanks mate, it is possible you have saved me much time. |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| On Apr 17, 9:53 am, Richard Ford <carnivalofreact...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: If you want to see one of the orginal founding members of nlp perform nlp, unsuccessfully I might add, with a woman, I can post the links, if this is the best nlp has to offer, then it is not much at all. Tim > > Thanks mate, it is possible you have saved me much time. |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| "HellBwat" <monsterbrat49@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:7e970b5f-9635-4f04-b4a0-9e4351adc47e@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 17, 9:53 am, Richard Ford <carnivalofreact...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > > > If you want to see one of the orginal founding members of nlp perform > nlp, unsuccessfully I might add, with a woman, I can post the links, > if this is the best nlp has to offer, then it is not much at all. > > > Tim Post them, please ... |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| On Apr 18, 6:02 am, "Otto Huber" <hko...@gmx.de> wrote: This is richard bandler trying to help a woman over come some problems, pay particular attention to his calibration skills, and also her responses to the stimuli she is introduced too. Then he keeps trying to convince her that change takes time, it doesn't when change happens it happens fast, as you'll note in this web page. http://www.essential-skills.com/ Listen to the video, It can't be this easy. So then, if richard is performing nlp and that is an example of nlp, then nlp sucks. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s941m...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RczTT...eature=related > > Post them, please ... |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| dianetics, nlp, war |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dianetics (Scientology) & Fritz Perls | NLPisParapsychology | alt-psychology-nlp | 0 | 06-12-2006 11:38 PM |